URGENT PUBLIC NOTICE

Life Force Plan of Action

8/13/2020


We are providing the attached information for every parent in the nation to equip them with the tools to make essential decisions on behalf of their children for the 2020 school year.


Attached is an information package including peer reviewed articles from various medical journals that address issues about the efficacy of wearing masks to prevent the spread of disease, studies on the treatment of SARS-CoV, and the 5G frequencies being the primary cause of COVID-19.


These articles appear to have been scrubbed from the internet and provide details essential for every parent to review before making what could be life or death decisions in regards to the upcoming school year.


Due to the complex nature of these medically reviewed articles, we have highlighted essential details within the text to make key points easier to identify, and provided summary explanations as needed. These articles have not been modified to change the content of the message in any way.


ACTIONABLE ITEMS:


We have attached a sample letter that we encourage you to read. We are providing this letter so that you see that we at the United News Channel are taking this matter seriously and taking personal accountability for ourselves and our families while encouraging you to do the same. You have our permission to use this document as a model if you would like to take similar action in your area.


This version of the letter is addressed to the Superintendent of Schools for the Oceanside area of New York State. Duplicate copies will be sent to various other officials including but not limited to the Department of Health, Attorney General, President, and anyone we feel may now or in the future have need to be put on notice for a crime being committed against the people.


*This letter will be sent using Registered Mail through the U.S.Post Office to ensure that the recipient has official notice that can be used as irrefutable evidence in any Lawful proceeding.


This letter makes reference to the New York Assembly and you may or may not be familiar with this group or one similar to it in your area. This refers to the Fourth Arm of the Government as described in the First Amendment of the Constitution. The People's Assemblies should be formed for every County in the Country to ensure the people have an active voice in the local and State Government. It is from this body that the People's Grand Jury can be formed to address criminal matters, levy indictments, and redress the grievances of the people.


By Law the local Sherrif for your County is required to enforce these rulings and protect the rights of the people against enemies both foreign and domestic according to the Constitution.


If you do not have a local Assembly, or would like to connect with your local Assembly, you can get more information on the Assemblies page at LifeForce.Global. In many cases this portion of your local Government has gone undeveloped and may require immediate action to organize and enact procedures to ensure that our Government remains one that is for and by the people.


We encourage self Governance according to the Constitution and only recommend the Lawful pursuit and enforcement of our Natural God given rights. Please take these matters seriously to avoid making frivolous claims and do your part to help shape the world you want to live in.


-Steffen "TANK" Rowe

Dear (NAME OF: School Official, Attorney General, Sheriff, Politician, etc.),
I recently received notice from the Board of Education requesting that I submit my plans for the school year beginning in the Fall of 2020. I received two options: to home/virtual school using Zoom conferencing, or send my children to school where they would be forced to wear a mask while in attendance, with some portion of the day allotted to being mask-free on a rotation basis.

Based on current published medical research as well as reports from the World Health Organization (WHO), I am concerned that your guidelines do not take into account the full scope of consequences to our children's health, and clearly do not make the appropriate adjustments to keep them safe. 2A

Recent studies and training from OSHA demonstrate that oxygen levels decrease by 25% within the first 15 minutes of wearing a mask of virtually any kind. Further evidence published in the medical journal, PubMed demonstrates that the primary cause for the COVID-19 virus relate to 5G frequencies that connect to the epidermis cells and act as antennae to create a receptive environment which leads to cellular release of RNA waste and bacteria. These bacteria are released when we exhale, sneeze, cough, blow our nose, and is contained in mucus, urine and feces. Breathing in, and being subjected to this bacteria-rich environment through the wearing of masks creates a condition of oxygen failure called Hypoxia, can contribute to the migration of the virus to the brain. It creates headaches and reduces oxygen levels, decreases immunity and increases risk of infection. REF 2B Hypoxic/acidic blood can be as subtle as having a headache, feeling short of breath, or confused. It can be a slow process over time with nearly undetectable cognitive decline before spiraling into severity. (Bacteria thrive in damp environments (condensation from breath) and 70-72 degrees, exact environment of masks.) REF 1A

WHO recently evaluated the spread of the COVID-19 virus and stated publicly that it "rarely passes from human to human," and that masks have no effect in halting the spread of the disease. This is additionally true due to improper PPE (Personal Protection Equipment) protocols that result in viral transmission including mask-touching, not washing hands before and after mask use and more, aspects which are virtually impossible to control in the school environment. REF 1B

The latest data provided by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) demonstrates that the survival rate for COVID 19 is 99.96%. This makes the virus less dangerous than even the common flu.

As residents of Nassau County, our property taxes pay salaries, maintain facilities, and provide training to the professionals we trust to educate our children and keep safe while they are in your care. This does not entitle you to the same rights as a parent. It does mean that you are responsible for making decisions in the best interest of the children of this community. As a paid professional making these decisions it is critical that you weigh and consider ALL of the data, laws, and fundamental rights of the people.

I am calling into question your discernment and due diligence in the research, review and consideration of the facts, scientific evidence, child development, laws, and practical application of safety measures you can, should, or have the authority to impose on students attending schools in your county.

No law exists that enables you to leverage or penalize a parent or student who attends your schools for not participating in any program that endangers the life of our children.

No law gives you the right to remove a parent's ability to make a living by forcing them to home school due to unlawful mandates imposed within the facilities paid for by the people, and which create a hazardous and irresponsible learning environment.

No law exists that that forces parents or students to abide by conclusions that ignore the facts, laws, and science that supports alternative safe, practical, common-sense solutions.

In addition, these unlawful mandates place families at grave risk for having their children removed from their homes by Child Protective Services (CPS). This is done by declaring parents unfit for challenging the school districts' unsafe decisions, and in many cases, for deciding to home or virtual school their children.

Furthermore, there are no grounds for the government or school boards to make medical decisions on how or which medical treatments parents use to protect their children, or which they use to treat their children for any condition.

Parents are being forced to decide between making the financial livings which maintain our homes and families, or sending our children into unsafe environments formed by the ill-informed decisions of leaders trying to maintain the status quo and keep their jobs.  

The non-choice between homeschooling and forcing children into an unsafe environment has been justified over clear and safe alternatives identified as early as 2004 by the director of the CDC himself, Dr. Fauci, who as the director of the NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) was involved in the 2005 study published in The Virology Journal, under the auspices of the NIH. The study stated that chloroquine was successful as both a treatment and a vaccine for the Coronavirus:
"Post infection chloroquine treatment is effective in preventing the spread of SARS- CoV infection." Ref. 1
Meanwhile, the Oceanside School is built less than half a mile from a 5G tower and uses 5G routers in the school so students can access their work using iPad rather than using books. 5G is what should be explored, banned and masked here, not children who will suffer untold, unsearched, and as yet unidentified side-effects created by not only breathing in the toxins expelled by their bodies, but by the unexplored psychological and social consequences of denying vital human contact and creating fear-based environments.

I have joined other parents from the district and across the country who clearly see the discrepancies between the facts and the course of actions you represent as our only options. In response to this negligence I am requesting the scientific data be provided and publicly posted for every parent addressing the full breadth of consequences to our children's physical and mental health, including all the above-named items, so parents may make informed decisions about the course of action school officials are attempting to impose on children attending school beginning in the fall of 2020. We assert this right to full and informed consent under the universal protections established and confirmed by the Nuremberg Code.

Secondly, I demand you provide the laws providing you or the State of New York the right to impose, mandate, or enforce medical decisions upon or regarding me or my children. With this I encourage you to consider the difference between statutes, codes, and ordinances which have no power if they violate the people's fundamental rights according 16 Jurisprudence 177 Section 2, and the Constitution, which is still the Supreme Law of the Land.

Thirdly, I demand you provide the laws that allow you to remove my fundamental rights as a parent for the care, custody and control of my children as upheld by the Supreme Court, in exchange for services rendered by the government of which I as a resident of Nassau County have already paid to participate in.

Realizing full well that there are statutes, codes, ordinances and mandates that have been presented as law do in fact exist that attempt to remove our rights in this manner, I want to state for the record that I am not bound by any of these corporate bylaws, nor is anyone who is not employed directly by the Government Corporation.
Rather than wasting your time and mine trying to fulfill the requests I've listed above, I'd prefer we mediate this grievance by proposing real solutions that address the real dangers threatening the health of our children and the school staff.

To call this a failure of epic proportions does not begin to describe the damage that would have been caused if you continued to move forward with this plan. This matter is in no way a frivolous claim, and a duplicate copy of this letter has been sent via certified mail to the Attorney General, the new Head of the State Health Department, the Governor, and the President of the United States.

In addition, this letter has been filed as a grievance to the New York Assembly and if an immediate remedy is not reached that properly considers the facts presented, a Grand Jury will be convened and all parties who have facilitated, allowed, and endorsed this hazardous situation will be held accountable in their personal and private capacity.

This letter serves as notice to all parties involved and a response is required within 5 business days or it will be made public and lawful action will be initiated. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

Steffen Rowe


 


DR. FAUCI AND THE 2005 ENDORESEMENT OF HYDROXYCHOLOQUINE IN THE TREATMENT OF CORONAVIRUS:

An article published by the Virology Journal dated August 22, 2005, calls into question some of Dr. Fauci’s past statements on Chloroquine (HydroxyChoroquine is a less toxic derivative of Chloroquine). The title is “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.”

The Virology Journal is officially published through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and is part of the United States National Library of Medicine, a branch of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Anthony Fauci, an immunologist, has served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984. NIAID is one of 27 institutes that make up the NIH. Dr. Fauci is the lead Medical Expert on the President’s Corona Task Force. See the full report here and see a reprinted summary below.

Dr. Fauci at the NIH with Effective Chloroquine Study in 2005, Now Forgets in 2020 | Right Wire Repor.pdf
https://www.dropbox.com/s/32jphbqa6rq7p0l

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS corona virus infection and spread, VIROLOGY JOURNAL AUG. 22, 2005
https://www.dropbox.com/s/js90y8w62gino1h/Chloroquine%20is%20a%20potent%20inhibitor%20of%20SARS%20coronavirus%20infection%20and%20spread%20%7C%20Virology%20Journal%20%7C%20Full.pdf?dl=0





The following article was supplied by the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons

https://aapsonline.org/

 June 1, 2020

Mask Facts
by Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.


Transmission of SARS-CoV-2
Note: A COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) particle is 0.125 micrometers (μm); influenza virus size is 0.08 – 0.12 μm; a human hair is about 150 μm.
*1 nm = 0.001 micron; 1000 nm = 1 micron; Micrometer (μm) is the preferred name for micron (an older term)
1 meter is = 1,000,000,000 nm or 1,000,000 microns
Droplets

Virus is transmitted through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes or talks. Larger respiratory droplets (>5 μm) remain in the air for only a short time and travel only short distances, generally <1 meter. They fall to the ground quickly. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30245-9/fulltext

This idea guides the CDC’s advice to maintain at least a 6-foot distance.

Virus-laden small (<5 μm) aerosolized droplets can remain in the air for at least 3 hours and travel long distances. https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMc2004973?articleTools=true

Air currents

In air conditioned environment these large droplets may travel farther.

However, ventilation — even the opening of an entrance door and a small window can dilute the number of small droplets to one half after 30 seconds. (This study looked at droplets from uninfected persons). This is clinically relevant because poorly ventilated and populated spaces, like public transport and nursing homes, have high SARS-CoV-2 disease transmission despite physical distancing. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30245-9/fulltext

Objects and surfaces

Person to person touching

The CDC’s most recent statement regarding contracting COVID-19 from touching surfaces: “Based on data from lab studies on Covid-19 and what we know about similar respiratory diseases, it may be possible that a person can get Covid-19 by touching a surface or object that has the virus on it and then touching their own mouth, nose or possibly their eyes,” the agency wrote. “But this isn’t thought to be the main way the virus spreads. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/s0522-cdc-updates-covid-transmission.html

Chinese study with data taken from swabs on surfaces around the hospital
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7/20-0885_article?deliveryName=USCDC_333-DM25707

The surfaces where tested with the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, which greatly amplifies the viral genetic material if it is present. That material is detectable when a person is actively infected. This is thought to be the most reliable test.

Computer mouse (ICU 6/8, 75%; General ward (GW) 1/5, 20%)

Trash cans (ICU 3/5, 60%; GW 0/8)

Sickbed handrails (ICU 6/14, 42.9%; GW 0/12)

Doorknobs (GW 1/12, 8.3%)

81.3% of the miscellaneous personal items were positive:

Exercise equipment

Medical equipment (spirometer, pulse oximeter, nasal cannula)

PC and iPads

Reading glasses

Cellular phones (83.3% positive for viral RNA)

Remote controls for in-room TVs (64.7% percent positive)

Toilets (81.0% positive)

Room surfaces (80.4% of all sampled)

Bedside tables and bed rails (75.0%)

Window ledges (81.8%)

Plastic: up to 2-3 days

Stainless Steel: up to 2-3 days

Cardboard: up to 1 day

Copper: up to 4 hours

Floor – gravity causes droplets to fall to the floor. Half of ICU workers all had virus on the bottoms of their shoes

*Data from a University of Illinois at Chicago review
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

HEPA (high efficiency particulate air) filters – 99.97 – 100% efficient. HEPA filters are tested with particles that are 0.125 μm.

Masks and respirators work by collecting particles through several physical mechanisms, including diffusion (small particles) and interception and impaction


(large particles)

N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) are constructed from electret (a dielectric material that has a quasi-permanent electric charge. An electret generates internal and external electric fields so the filter material has electrostatic attraction for additional collection of all particle sizes. As flow increases, particles will be collected less efficiently.

N95 – A properly fitted N95 will block 95% of tiny air particles down to 0.3 μm from reaching the wearer’s face. https://www.honeywell.com/en-us/newsroom/news/2020/03/n95-masks-explained.

*PARTICLE SIZE FOR COVID-19 is .12 μm

But even these have problems: many have exhalation valve for easier breathing and less moisture inside the mask.

Surgical masks are designed to protect patients from a surgeon’s respiratory droplets, aren’t effective at blocking particles smaller than 100 μm. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:VLXWeZBll7YJ:https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/957730O/respirators-and-surgical-masks-contrast-technical-bulletin.pdf+&cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Filter efficiency was measured across a wide range of small particle sizes (0.02 to 1 µm) at 33 and 99 L/min.

N95 respirators had efficiencies greater than 95% (as expected).

T-shirts had 10% efficiency,

Scarves 10% to 20%,

Cloth masks 10% to 30%,

Sweatshirts 20% to 40%, and

Towels 40%.

All of the cloth masks and materials had near zero efficiency at 0.3 µm, a particle size that easily penetrates into the lungs.

Another study evaluated 44 masks, respirators, and other materials with similar methods and small aerosols (0.08 and 0.22 µm).

N95 FFR filter efficiency was greater than 95%.

Medical masks – 55% efficiency

General masks – 38% and

Handkerchiefs – 2% (one layer) to 13% (four layers) efficiency.

Conclusion: Wearing masks will not reduce SARS-CoV-2.

N95 masks protect health care workers, but are not recommended for source control transmission.

Surgical masks are better than cloth but not very efficient at preventing emissions from infected patients.

Cloth masks will be ineffective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, whether worn as source control or as personal protective equipment (PPE).

“Masks may confuse that message and give people a false sense of security. If masks had been the solution in Asia, shouldn’t they have stopped the pandemic before it spread elsewhere?”
*The first randomized controlled trial of cloth masks. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

Penetration of cloth masks by particles was 97% and medical masks 44%, 3M Vflex 9105 N95 (0.1%), 3M 9320 N95 (<0.01%).

Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.

The virus may survive on the surface of the face- masks

Self-contamination through repeated use and improper doffing is possible. A contaminated cloth mask may transfer pathogen from the mask to the bare hands of the wearer.

Cloth masks should not be recommended for health care workers, particularly in high-risk situations, and guidelines need to be updated.

*A study of 4 patients in South Korea
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342
Known patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 wore masks and coughed into a Petrie dish. “Both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.”


*Singapore Study – Few people used mask correctly
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/publichealth/86601
Overall, data were collected from 714 men and women. About half the sample were women and all adult ages were represented. Only 90 participants (12.6%, 95% CI 10.3%-15.3%) passed the visual mask fit test.

 

About three-quarters performed strap placement incorrectly, 61% left a “visible gap between the mask and skin,” and about 60% didn’t tighten the nose-clip.
*A 2011 randomized Australian clinical trial of standard medical/surgical masks
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00198.x?fbclid=IwAR3kRYVYDKb0aR-su9_me9_vY6a8KVR4HZ17J2A_80f_fXUABRQdh


Medical masks offered no protection at all from influenza.
Conclusions from Organizations


The World Health Organization (WHO):
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331693/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.3-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y


“Advice to decision makers on the use of masks for healthy people in community settings
As described above, the wide use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not supported by current evidence and carries uncertainties and critical risks.”


“Medical masks should be reserved for health care workers. The use of medical masks in the community may create a false sense of security, with neglect of other essential measures, such as hand hygiene practices and physical distancing, and may lead to touching the face under the masks and under the eyes, result in unnecessary costs, and take masks away from those in health care who need them most, especially when masks are in short supply.”


“Masks are effective only when used in combination with frequent hand-cleaning with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water.”


WHO acknowledges that most people do not use masks properly.
Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the Center for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory

Diseases:
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/t0131-2019-novel-coronavirus.html
“We don’t routinely recommend the use of face masks by the public to prevent respiratory illness,” said on January 31. “And we certainly are not recommending that at this time for this new virus.”


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/infectioncontrol/maskguidance.htm
In March 5, 2019 regarding the flu: “Masks are not usually recommended in non-healthcare settings; however, this guidance provides other strategies for limiting the spread of influenza viruses in the community: cover their nose and mouth when coughing or sneezing,use tissues to contain respiratory secretions and, after use, to dispose of them in the nearest waste receptacle, and perform hand hygiene (e.g., handwashing with non-antimicrobial soap and water, and alcohol-based hand rub if soap and water are not available) after having contact with respiratory secretions and contaminated objects/materials."

From the New England Journal of Medicine
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.”
Final Thoughts

Surgical masks – loose fitting. They are designed to protect the patient from the doctors’ respiratory droplets.  The wearer is not protected from others airborne particles

People do not wear masks properly. Most people have the mask under the nose. The wearer does not have glasses on and the eyes are a portal of entry.

The designer masks and scarves offer minimal protection – they give a false sense of security to both the wearer and those around the wearer.
**Not to mention they add a perverse lightheartedness to the situation.


If you are walking alone, no mask – avoid folks – that is common sense.

Remember – children under 2 should not wear masks – accidental suffocation and difficulty breathing in some

If wearing a mask makes people go out and get Vitamin D – go for it. In the 1918 flu pandemic people who went outside did better.  Early reports are showing people with COVID-19 with low Vitamin D do worse than those with normal levels. Perhaps that is why shut-ins do so poorly. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.08.20058578v4

If you are sick, stay home!
Additional Resource: Healthy People Wearing Masks, Should They or Shouldn’t They? This ER nurse with over two decades of experience took a deep dive into the science to find out: https://jennifermargulis.net/healthy-people-wearing-masks-during-covid19/


Hydroxychloroquine Case Is Filed in the Sixth Circuit by AAPS

 

 
 
 

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

Published on June 9th, 2020 on CNN

"From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual," Van Kerkhove said on Monday.

"We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing. They're following asymptomatic cases, they're following contacts and they're not finding secondary transmission onward. It is very rare -- and much of that is not published in the literature," she said. "We are constantly looking at this data and we're trying to get more information from countries to truly answer this question. It still appears to be rare that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward."

COMPLETE ARTICLE

 
 

©2020 by LIFE FORCE STUDIOS INC.